Former SDSU Coach Beth Burns Trial (Burns Testifies) Day 3 Part 3 09/06/16 | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

University search committee conducts search for a new employee, raises questions of gender bias in hiring process.

Key Insights

• 👨‍🔬 The University had a search committee in place to conduct a search for a new employee.
• 👨‍🔬 The search committee included Tammy Greece and Mr. Mace from the department.
• 🕵️‍♀️ Miss Kramer objected to the selection of Mr. Saleem, citing the need for a female candidate in the position.
• 🧘 The process of hiring for the position involved interviews with multiple candidates, including Mr. Saleem.

Transcript

Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).

Questions & Answers

Q: Was there a search committee formed to find a replacement for Miss Curtin?

Yes, a search committee was formed to conduct a search for a new employee to replace Miss Curtin.

Q: Who was on the search committee?

The search committee included Tammy Greece, an assistant coach, and Mr. Mace from the department.

Q: Did the search committee also consider other coaching staff members for the position?

It is unclear whether other coaching staff members were on the search committee.

Q: Why did Miss Kramer object to the selection of Mr. Saleem?

Miss Kramer objected to the selection of Mr. Saleem because she believed a female candidate should have been chosen instead.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• A search committee was formed to find a replacement for Miss Curtin, a former University employee.

• The committee included Tammy Greece, an assistant coach, and Mr. Mace from the department.

• Interviews were conducted with multiple candidates for the position, including Mr. Saleem.

• Miss Kramer objected to the selection of Mr. Saleem, stating that a female candidate should have been chosen.