Wallace Bradsher Trial Day 1 Part 1 Agent Danny Mays Testifies | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

An investigator for the State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) shares details about his inquiries into allegations of district attorneys hiring each other's wives and possible misconduct involving a law school and state employment.

Key Insights

• 👨‍🏫 Mr. Mays followed up on allegations of district attorneys hiring each other's wives and possible misconduct involving a law school and state employment.
• 🪈 The investigation included interviews with relevant individuals and verification of employment records.

Transcript

Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).

Questions & Answers

Q: How did the investigation into the allegations of district attorneys hiring each other's wives begin?

The investigation started after a prosecutor, Jason Ramey, approached the investigator, Mr. Mays, with information about the wives of two district attorneys working for each other.

Q: What steps did Mr. Mays take to verify the information provided?

Mr. Mays conducted interviews with relevant individuals, such as the sheriff and defense attorney, and checked employment records at the administrative office of the court. He also conducted surveillance at a law school to verify attendance.

Q: Was there any evidence found to support the allegations of district attorneys hiring each other's wives?

Yes, Mr. Mays confirmed that the wives of the district attorneys were employed by the other district attorney, as reported. He also found evidence of one of the wives attending the law school mentioned.

Q: How did the investigation progress after Mr. Mays retired from the SBI?

After Mr. Mays retired, the investigation was passed on to another team, and the case proceeded based on the information gathered during his inquiries.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• The investigator, Mr. Mays, was approached by a prosecutor with information about district attorneys hiring each other's wives.

• Mr. Mays followed up on the information by conducting interviews and surveillances to verify the allegations, including checking employment records and conducting drive-bys at a law school.

• The investigation eventually led to the opening of an official investigation authorized by a Superior Court judge.