Leica Q2 VS Fuji X100V - 5 Months Later (+ Sample Images) | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR
After using the Leica Q2 for five months, the author concludes that while the camera has its flaws and may not be worth the price, it offers a simplified shooting experience and produces reliable, high-quality images.
Key Insights
- 🎥 The content creator has been using the Leica Q2 camera for the past five months, comparing it to their previous Fuji X100V.
- 🧭 The creator has used the Leica Q2 extensively in various locations, including the Netherlands, Iceland, and New York.
- 🌍 The content creator believes that their experience with the Leica Q2 has been sufficient to form a conclusion about whether it was worth upgrading from the Fuji X100V.
- 💸 Objectively speaking, the Leica Q2 is not three times better than the Fuji X100V, as it lacks certain features and has issues with autofocus, white balance, and colors.
- ❓ However, the content creator does not regret their purchase and still chooses to use the Leica Q2 over the Fuji X100V.
- 🗨️ The viewfinder of the Leica Q2 is not reliable in high-contrast situations and the auto white balance can be off.
- 🔲 The Leica Q2 has a simpler button and dial layout compared to the Fuji X100V, leading to fewer accidental settings changes.
- 📷 The Leica Q2 offers better low-light performance, higher ISO noise performance, and a better lens for bokeh. The overall image quality is also considered superior.
- 🎉 The fun factor of using the Leica Q2 lies in its simplicity, reliability, and the "cool factor" associated with owning a Leica camera.
Transcript
Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).
Questions & Answers
Q: What are some of the criticisms and points raised by viewers in previous videos about the Leica Q2?
In previous videos, viewers raised concerns about the omission of certain features present in the Fuji X100V, such as the built-in ND filter and flash. They also argued that comparing the two cameras was unfair because of the large price difference.
Q: How does the author compare the viewfinders of the Leica Q2 and the Fuji X100V?
The author finds that the viewfinder of the Leica Q2 has limitations in high-contrast situations and struggles with accurate exposure. In comparison, the viewfinder of the Fuji X100V provides a more realistic representation of the final image.
Q: How does the low light performance of the Leica Q2 compare to the Fuji X100V?
The Leica Q2 outperforms the Fuji X100V in low light situations due to its wide aperture, integrated stabilization, and better high ISO performance.
Q: What advantages does the Leica Q2 offer over the Fuji X100V in terms of image quality?
The Leica Q2 produces cleaner, higher-resolution images with better low light performance than the Fuji X100V. The author also notes that the Leica images, although requiring some editing, have a less artificial look compared to the Fuji images when viewed on larger screens.
Q: How does the author describe the overall shooting experience with the Leica Q2?
The author finds the shooting experience with the Leica Q2 to be simplified, reliable, and fun. They appreciate the camera's no-nonsense approach to photography and its focus on getting the shot.
Summary & Key Takeaways
-
The author compares their experience using the Leica Q2 to their previous experience with the Fuji X100V.
-
They address criticisms and points raised by viewers in previous videos.
-
The author discusses various aspects of the Leica Q2, including the viewfinder, autofocus, build quality, price, and image quality.