Trial Attorney Andrew Cherkasky Discusses the Difficulty of Defending #JeremiahMonell | Summary and Q&A

TL;DR

Witness testimonies, investigations, and defense strategies are highlighted in the trials of Jeremiah Monell in New Jersey and Charles Merritt in California.

Key Insights

• 💼 Credible witnesses and their calm, straightforward testimonies are critical in swaying jury opinions in both the Monell and Merritt cases.
• 😓 The defense in the Monell case focuses on casting doubt on the credibility of witnesses and explores possibilities that someone else may have committed the crime.
• 😄 The Monell case is challenging for the defense, as the client rejects plea deals and exhibits reluctance towards accepting a defense strategy.
• 👪 The length of time between the crime and the discovery of the McStay family's remains poses challenges for the prosecution in the Merritt case in terms of gathering conclusive forensic evidence.
• 👪 The defense in the Merritt case highlights the lack of evidence indicating a crime occurred in the family's home, suggesting an alternative theory involving a third party.

Transcript

Read and summarize the transcript of this video on Glasp Reader (beta).

Questions & Answers

Q: How significant is the testimony from Glen A. Jusen in the Jeremiah Monell case?

Glen A. Jusen's testimony is crucial as he was one of the first witnesses to arrive at the crime scene. His observations and paramedic background lend credibility to his testimony, making it highly impactful for the prosecution.

Q: How does the defense attorney in the Monell case handle the 12-year-old witness?

The defense attorney recognizes the challenges of dealing with a young witness and acknowledges the potential for misperception or manipulation. They may attempt to poke holes in the child's credibility and highlight the emotional vulnerability as a way to cast doubt on his testimony.

Q: In the Merritt case, why did investigators explore the possibility of the family crossing the border into Mexico?

Investigators considered the possibility of the family crossing the border based on the last known location of the family's vehicle and common practices of people illegally parking in that area to cross into Mexico. They wanted to cover all possible leads, even if they turned out to be unsubstantiated.

Summary & Key Takeaways

• Testimony from a neighbor, Glen A. Jusen, who observed the crime scene in the Jeremiah Monell case, described the condition of the victim's body and actions taken after discovering the crime.

• Defense attorney Andrew Jurkowski discusses the importance of credible witnesses and the challenges of representing a client who refuses to accept a plea deal.

• Testimony from the 12-year-old son of the victim and defendant in the Monell case provides compelling evidence, though the defense may attempt to cast doubt on his perception and credibility.

• In the Charles Merritt case, witnesses discuss the condition of the McStay family's home during a welfare check and the subsequent investigation.