Avoiding the Pitfalls: 10 Mistakes to Avoid in Writing Alternate History
Hatched by Diego Ospina Serna
Apr 10, 2024
4 min read
3 views
Copy Link
Avoiding the Pitfalls: 10 Mistakes to Avoid in Writing Alternate History
Introduction:
When authors delve into the realm of alternate history, they have the opportunity to create intricate counterfactual universes. However, in their quest for historical accuracy, they often make mistakes that undermine the coherence and effectiveness of their narratives. In this article, we will explore the ten worst mistakes that authors of alternate history commonly make. By understanding and avoiding these pitfalls, writers can create captivating and believable alternate worlds that engage readers and offer thought-provoking insights.
1. Concentrating too much on one changed event:
One common mistake authors make is focusing solely on the one event that alters history, neglecting the events that led up to it. To create a believable alternate history, it is essential to consider the broader context and explore the ripple effects of various historical factors. By doing so, authors can provide readers with a more comprehensive understanding of the alternate universe they have created.
2. Failing to bring the alternate history up to the present:
An alternate history is not just a journey into the past; it is an opportunity to reimagine the world as we know it today. Neglecting to bring the alternate history up to the reader's present deprives the narrative of its full potential. By incorporating elements of the present into the alternate universe, authors can offer readers a fresh perspective on real-world history and allow them to reflect on the contingency of events.
3. Not recognizing the inevitability of certain historical developments:
In altering history, authors must acknowledge that some historical developments were likely to occur regardless of any changed events. Merely changing one pivotal moment may not be sufficient to reshape the course of history. To create a compelling alternate history, authors need to identify significant changes that occurred earlier in history, which could have led to the desired alterations.
4. Ignoring important historical factors:
While it is crucial to select which historical points to pursue and which to leave aside, authors should not overlook the factors that were significant at the time. By acknowledging and incorporating these factors, even if they are not immediately critical to the story, authors can create a more authentic and engaging alternate history.
5. Failing to account for the ripple effects of major changes:
Changing one historical event will inevitably lead to ripple effects, which in turn create more ripples. Authors cannot account for all the ramifications of a point of departure, but they should pay attention to events that came close to happening in real history. These events could have easily occurred if circumstances were different, adding depth and realism to the alternate history.
6. Mixing up urban legends with actual history:
Authors often fall into the trap of assuming they know historical facts that are, in reality, based on folk-history and misinformation. It is essential to critically examine the knowledge we think we possess and conduct thorough research. By avoiding assumptions and delving into accurate historical information, authors can create a more reliable and immersive alternate history.
7. Assuming that nothing or everything will change besides the one alteration:
Both extremes can undermine the credibility of an alternate history. Pretending that absolutely nothing apart from one event will change is unrealistic, just as assuming that everything will be completely different. Striking a balance between continuity and change is crucial for crafting a believable alternate universe.
8. Making the story go where you want it to go, instead of where the altered history supports:
While authors have the creative freedom to shape their narratives, they must ensure that the changes they introduce plausibly lead to the desired outcomes. By allowing the altered history to guide the story's direction, authors can maintain coherence and credibility in their alternate universes.
9. Explaining too much:
While research is vital for creating an alternate history, authors should be cautious not to overwhelm readers with excessive explanations. Integrating pertinent details organically within the narrative is essential. By striking a balance between providing necessary information and avoiding unnecessary exposition, authors can keep readers engaged and immersed in the story.
10. Forgetting to tell a good story:
Ultimately, the success of an alternate history lies in its ability to captivate readers. By creating compelling characters and narratives worth telling, authors can elevate their alternate universes beyond mere intellectual exercises. Balancing historical accuracy with engaging storytelling is the key to crafting a timeless and memorable alternate history.
Conclusion:
Writing alternate history requires a delicate balance of historical accuracy, imaginative storytelling, and attention to detail. By avoiding the ten common mistakes discussed in this article, authors can create alternate universes that captivate readers, offer new perspectives on real-world history, and provoke thought. To summarize the key takeaways, here are three actionable pieces of advice for authors of alternate history:
- 1. Pay attention to the broader context and ripple effects of historical changes.
- 2. Strike a balance between continuity and change in your alternate universe.
- 3. Focus on creating compelling characters and narratives that resonate with readers.
By following these guidelines, authors can create alternate histories that stand the test of time and leave a lasting impact on readers.
Resource:
Copy Link