The Government's Anti-Inflation Basket and the Ethical Question of Inequality

Lucas Charbonnier

Lucas Charbonnier

Oct 29, 20233 min read

0

The Government's Anti-Inflation Basket and the Ethical Question of Inequality

Introduction:

In March, the government, in collaboration with the retail industry, will introduce an anti-inflation basket due to the rising prices of raw materials. This initiative aims to address the economic challenges faced by consumers. While the basket will include around fifty products, it will exclude alcohol and confectionery items. These products will be categorized into five major groups, including hygiene, cleanliness, fresh produce, frozen goods, and groceries. At first glance, this endeavor seems like a commendable effort to combat inflation and support the population. However, it also raises questions about the broader issue of inequality and whether all forms of inequality should be considered unjust.

The Nature of Inequality:

Gorgias Calliclès argues that natural inequalities are not injustices, as they align with the order of nature. According to him, by preventing the stronger individuals from exercising their power, the law defends the interests of the weaker ones, thereby violating the domination of the strong over the weak. In this perspective, natural inequalities are seen as a natural and just outcome of the social order.

The Need to Address Inequality:

However, it is essential to acknowledge and address certain forms of inequality. Firstly, the insufficiency of the "law of the jungle" approach, where the strongest dominate, raises concerns about whether nature alone determines outcomes. How can we ensure that it is indeed nature expressing itself and not the structures of our political and social community? This raises questions about the fairness of an unregulated system that perpetuates inequality.

Secondly, Karl Marx argues that social inequalities stem not from differences in individual merit but from social disparities. In other words, inequality is not solely a result of natural abilities or efforts but is deeply rooted in societal structures. This understanding encourages us to work towards reducing these inequalities and creating a fairer society.

The Ethical Aspect of Inequality:

John Rawls introduces the concept of "just inequality," suggesting that economic and social disparities should benefit the most disadvantaged individuals to be considered fair. This perspective highlights the importance of equity in addressing inequality. While inequalities may persist, they can be justified if they result in a more equal distribution of resources and opportunities, particularly for those who are traditionally marginalized.

Connecting the Dots:

The government's anti-inflation basket aims to alleviate the economic burden on consumers. Simultaneously, the discussion on inequality challenges us to consider the broader implications of economic disparities. By addressing the rising prices of essential goods, the government acknowledges the need to ensure access to basic necessities for all individuals, regardless of their socio-economic status. However, it is crucial to go beyond short-term measures and tackle the root causes of inequality to create a society that is fair and just.

Actionable Advice:

1. Advocate for policies that promote a fair distribution of resources and opportunities. By supporting initiatives that address systemic inequalities, we can contribute to a more equitable society.

2. Engage in conversations and raise awareness about the ethical dimensions of inequality. By fostering dialogue and understanding, we can collectively work towards finding solutions to this complex issue.

3. Support organizations and initiatives that empower marginalized communities. By actively contributing to efforts that uplift those who face the brunt of inequality, we can make a tangible difference in creating a more just society.

Conclusion:

As the government prepares to introduce the anti-inflation basket, we are reminded of the ethical implications of inequality. While natural inequalities may be deemed just, societal disparities require our attention and action. By addressing the root causes of inequality and promoting fairness, we can strive towards a more equal society. Through policy changes, awareness campaigns, and individual efforts, we can contribute to the creation of a world where everyone has an equal opportunity to thrive.

Want to hatch new ideas?

Glasp AI allows you to hatch new ideas based on your curated content. Let's curate and create with Glasp AI :)