Why is travelling by train so much more expensive than flying? And why is the recycling symbol on plastic products often misleading? These are two questions that may seem unrelated at first, but upon closer examination, they reveal a common thread - the impact of subsidies and misleading information on our daily lives.

Alfred Tang

Alfred Tang

Mar 02, 20244 min read

0

Why is travelling by train so much more expensive than flying? And why is the recycling symbol on plastic products often misleading? These are two questions that may seem unrelated at first, but upon closer examination, they reveal a common thread - the impact of subsidies and misleading information on our daily lives.

When it comes to the cost of train travel versus flying, the answer lies in the subsidies provided to the aviation industry. While aviation only accounts for about 3 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions, it receives a disproportionate amount of support. This results in artificially low ticket prices for flights, making them more affordable for consumers. On the other hand, the train industry does not enjoy the same level of subsidies, leading to higher ticket prices.

The reason behind these polluting subsidies on the airline side can be attributed to various factors. Governments often provide financial support to airlines to boost tourism and stimulate economic growth. Additionally, the aviation industry is highly competitive, with airlines constantly trying to attract passengers with low fares. This creates a race to the bottom in terms of pricing, ultimately leading to governments stepping in to provide subsidies to keep airlines afloat.

However, it is important to note that these subsidies come at a cost. The environmental impact of aviation is significant, with carbon emissions contributing to climate change. By artificially lowering the cost of flights, these subsidies encourage more people to choose air travel over more sustainable options such as trains. This perpetuates a cycle of increased carbon emissions and exacerbates the climate crisis.

Shifting our focus to the recycling symbol on plastic products, it is crucial to understand its true meaning. The number within the recycling symbol is meant to identify the type of plastic used for the product. However, many people mistakenly believe that the presence of this symbol automatically indicates that the product is recyclable. This misconception has led to widespread confusion and an increase in plastic waste.

The well-recognized "chasing arrows" symbol may give consumers a false sense of security when it comes to recycling. In reality, the recyclability of a plastic product depends on various factors such as local recycling infrastructure and market demand for specific types of plastics. Just because a product has a recycling symbol does not guarantee that it will be accepted for recycling or effectively processed.

This lack of clarity in recycling symbols contributes to the growing plastic pollution crisis. Misinformed consumers often discard plastic products with the belief that they will be recycled, only for them to end up in landfills or polluting our oceans. To address this issue, education and awareness campaigns are crucial to ensure that consumers understand the limitations of recycling symbols and make more informed choices about their plastic consumption.

In conclusion, the issues of expensive train travel and misleading recycling symbols on plastic products both highlight the presence of subsidies and misinformation in our daily lives. To combat these challenges, we can take action in the following ways:

  • 1. Advocate for fair subsidies: Encourage governments to reconsider their support for the aviation industry and instead invest in sustainable transportation options such as trains. By leveling the playing field, we can make train travel more affordable and encourage people to choose greener alternatives.
  • 2. Promote accurate recycling information: Support initiatives that aim to educate consumers about the true meaning of recycling symbols on plastic products. By raising awareness about the limitations of recycling and the importance of reducing plastic consumption, we can empower individuals to make more environmentally conscious choices.
  • 3. Demand transparency from manufacturers: Hold companies accountable for their use of plastic packaging and their recycling claims. By pressuring manufacturers to provide clear and accurate information about the recyclability of their products, we can ensure that consumers are better informed and can make more sustainable purchasing decisions.

By addressing these issues at both the policy and individual levels, we can work towards a more sustainable future where transportation is affordable and environmentally friendly, and where plastic waste is minimized through informed consumer choices.

Want to hatch new ideas?

Glasp AI allows you to hatch new ideas based on your curated content. Let's curate and create with Glasp AI :)