t if inconsistencies are reconcilable, the Court looks at other material on record. The Court also categorized cases into three groups: cases with reconcilable inconsistencies, cases with irreconcilable inconsistencies, and cases with diametrically opposed dying declarations
when inconsistencies arise between different dying declarations, the nature of these inconsistencies, whether material or not, must be examined
serious doubts arise concerning their truthfulness. If reliable corroborative evidence is available, it should be considered to test the credibility of the dying declarations.
Amol Singh v. State of M.P.(2008)
inconsistencies between multiple dying declarations must be assessed in the context of surrounding facts and circumstances. This scrutiny enables the Court to determine which declaration holds more value in specific scenario
Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.