Top Highlights

• Trial Court while taking cognizance of title documents vide Exs.D-1 to D-4 coupled with other supporting documents, was of the view that the suit schedule property is self acquired property of Rangamma. Referring to the recitals, Trial Court found that there is no mention in regard to the joint earning of plaintiff and his elder brother K.S.Narasim...
• If the endorsement reads as above, then it has to be inferred that the sale consideration was in fact paid by Rangamma through plaintiff who had only handed over the sale consideration. Mere handing over of sale consideration by the plaintiff at the time of execution of sale deed will not in itself create a right and therefore, Appellate Court was ...
• He would further contend that the evidence on record is sufficient enough to arrive at a conclusion that both the brothers out of their joint exertion have purchased the suit schedule property and therefore
• there they started hotel business jointly and out of the income generated from the hotel business, he along with his elder brother purchased the suit schedule property. To substantiate this fact, there is absolutely no evidence let in by plaintiff
• By placing reliance on the endorsements in the sale deeds, plaintiff claims that he has equally contributed to the sale consideration. But on reading the endorsements, this Court would also find that the endorsement only indicates that the money that was paid by Rangamma was handed over by plaintiff to the vendor. The endorsement nowhere indicates ...

Domain