The EU and U.S. diverge on AI regulation: A transatlantic comparison and steps to alignment | Brookings thumbnail
The EU and U.S. diverge on AI regulation: A transatlantic comparison and steps to alignment | Brookings
www.brookings.edu
The U.S. approach to AI risk management is highly distributed across federal agencies, many adapting to AI without new legal authorities. Meanwhile, the U.S. has invested in non-regulatory infrastructure, such as a new AI risk management framework, evaluations of facial recognition software, and ext
2 Users
0 Comments
22 Highlights
0 Notes

Top Highlights

  • The U.S. approach to AI risk management is highly distributed across federal agencies, many adapting to AI without new legal authorities. Meanwhile, the U.S. has invested in non-regulatory infrastructure, such as a new AI risk management framework, evaluations of facial recognition software, and extensive funding of AI research. The EU approach to ...
  • Second, GDPR guarantees an individual’s right to “meaningful information about the logic” of algorithmic systems, at times controversially deemed a “right to explanation.”
  • There are other examples, however, in no sector does any agency have the legal authorities necessary to enforce all of the principles expressed by the AIBoR, nor those in EO 13859.
  • The February 2019 executive order, Maintaining American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence (EO 13859), and its ensuing Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance (M-21-06) presented the first federal approach to AI oversight.
  • he EU and the U.S. are jointly pivotal to the future of global AI governance. Ensuring that EU and U.S. approaches to AI risk management are generally aligned will facilitate bilateral trade, improve regulatory oversight, and enable broader transatlantic cooperation.

Ready to highlight and find good content?

Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.