Why Science Can't Settle Political Disputes thumbnail
Why Science Can't Settle Political Disputes
thereader.mitpress.mit.edu
1 Users
0 Comments
0 Highlights
0 Notes

Summary

- ๐Ÿ” **Political Influence**: Recent literature suggests that political agendas often overshadow scientific findings, complicating the relationship between the two fields.
- ๐Ÿšฌ **Historical Examples**: Historians like Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway highlight how industries, such as tobacco and fossil fuels, have manipulated scientific discourse to create doubt about harmful effects.
- ๐ŸŒ **Manufactured Uncertainty**: Business lobbies and certain scientists have formed organizations aimed at questioning established scientific results, not to enhance understanding but to stall regulatory actions.
- โš–๏ธ **Regulatory Delays**: The tactics employed by these groups focus on generating enough uncertainty to delay necessary regulations that could protect public health and the environment.
- ๐Ÿ“š **Complex Interplay**: The intersection of science and politics is intricate, and simplistic views of the problem often overlook the deeper issues at play.

Ready to highlight and find good content?

Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded peopleโ€™s learning.