The "eat less meat" movement is growing. Does it distort science? thumbnail
The "eat less meat" movement is growing. Does it distort science?
thecounter.org
She sees no benefit to eliminating meat from what can otherwise be nutrient-poor, soda-rich diets. he agrees with many nutritionists who assert that meat is an irreplaceable, nutrient-dense food group, especially for children, women and at-risk populations. But the reality is, eating meat is really
1 Users
0 Comments
4 Highlights
0 Notes

Top Highlights

  • She sees no benefit to eliminating meat from what can otherwise be nutrient-poor, soda-rich diets.
  • he agrees with many nutritionists who assert that meat is an irreplaceable, nutrient-dense food group, especially for children, women and at-risk populations.
  • But the reality is, eating meat is really not the problem and giving it up could cause more harm than good.
  • It’s the biggest form of greenwashing there is today.

Ready to highlight and find good content?

Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.