A single year’s entry for net earnings is worthless to Warren; he is interested in whether or not there is consistency in the earnings picture and whether the long-term trend is upward—both of which can be equated to “durability” of the competitive advantage.
So when Warren is looking at a company’s financial statement, he is looking for consistency. Does it consistently have high gross margins? Does it consistently carry little or no debt? Does it consistently not have to spend large sums on research and development? Does it show consistent earnings? Does it show a consistent growth in earnings? It is ...
As a very general rule (and there are exceptions): Companies with gross profit margins of 40% or better tend to be companies with some sort of durable competitive advantage. Companies with gross profit margins below 40% tend to be companies in highly competitive industries, where competition is hurting overall profit margins (there are exceptions h...
Here then is Warren’s rule: Companies that have to spend heavily on R&D have an inherent flaw in their competitive advantage that will always put their long-term economics at risk, which means they are not a sure thing. And if it is not a sure thing, Warren is not interested.
As a rule, Warren’s favorite durable competitive advantage holders in the consumer products category all have interest payouts of less than 15% of operating income.
Share This Book 📚
Ready to highlight and find good content?
Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.