Ben H.
@abhcBen
Talks about healthcare
Joined May 27, 2023
3
Following
3
Followers
468
1.41k
1.04k
www.wsj.com/articles/amtrak-acela-high-speed-train-2024-a7d8f2ca?mod=us_more_pos1
May 30, 2023
3
www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-fading-recovery-reveals-deeper-economic-struggles-31f4097b?mod=world_lead_story
May 30, 2023
3
www.continuumrx.com/
May 29, 2023
41
www.modernhealthcare.com/safety-quality/home-infusion-therapy-safe-costs
May 29, 2023
11
affirmedrx.com/solutions/
May 29, 2023
7
www.wsj.com/articles/with-psych-wards-full-mentally-ill-accused-of-crimes-languish-in-jail-baee0279?mod=hp_lead_pos3
May 29, 2023
62
www.wsj.com/articles/more-high-school-grads-forgo-college-in-hot-labor-market-c052c773?mod=hp_lead_pos5
May 29, 2023
2
www.wsj.com/articles/erdogans-next-focus-turkeys-place-on-the-world-stage-bbba032d?mod=hp_lista_pos2
May 29, 2023
2
www.wsj.com/articles/why-are-markets-so-calm-its-revenge-of-the-quant-funds-26a93425?mod=hp_lead_pos8
May 29, 2023
11
www.wsj.com/articles/elizabeth-holmes-prison-inmates-3a46a79f?mod=hp_lead_pos9
May 28, 2023
1
www.wsj.com/articles/texas-house-votes-to-impeach-ag-ken-paxton-5f20d126?mod=hp_lead_pos2
May 28, 2023
41
www.jotform.com/blog/hcahps-star-ratings/
May 28, 2023
3
hcahpsonline.org/globalassets/hcahps/facts/hcahps_fact_sheet_march_2021.pdf
May 28, 2023
5
www.wsj.com/articles/ron-desantis-presidential-race-2024-donald-trump-florida-90b2c2e4?mod=hp_opin_pos_4
May 28, 2023
2
www.wsj.com/articles/alo-yoga-workout-sets-a8a15492?mod=hp_lista_pos3
May 28, 2023
11
www.wsj.com/articles/url-hospital-patients-better-experience-800414d8?mod=hp_lista_pos2
May 28, 2023
21
www.medicare.gov/care-compare/?redirect=true&providerType=Hospital
May 28, 2023
11
www.wsj.com/articles/your-next-big-move-should-scare-you-15d23b48?mod=hp_user_preferences_pos3
May 28, 2023
11
kffhealthnews.org/news/hospital-penalties/
May 28, 2023
1
www.verywellhealth.com/how-does-a-drg-determine-how-much-a-hospital-gets-paid-1738874
May 28, 2023
5
pnhp.org/a-brief-history-universal-health-care-efforts-in-the-us/
May 28, 2023
121
www.modernhealthcare.com/people/matt-eyles-ahip-ceo-resign
May 27, 2023
11
kffhealthnews.org/news/article/denials-of-health-insurance-claims-are-rising-and-getting-weirder/
May 27, 2023
33
www.modernhealthcare.com/politics-policy/medicaid-redeterminations-disenrollment-states-administrative-hurdles
May 27, 2023
21
www.modernhealthcare.com/finance/cleveland-clinic-earnings-first-quarter-2023
May 27, 2023
11
www.rand.org/pubs/periodicals/health-quarterly/issues/v4/n3/09.html
May 27, 2023
32
www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HVBP/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing
May 27, 2023
53
The campaign for some form of universal government-funded health care has stretched for nearly a century in the US On several occasions, advocates believed they were on the verge of success; yet each time they faced defeat
one of the first systems, for workers beginning in Germany in 1883; other countries including Austria, Hungary, Norway, Britain, Russia, and the Netherlands followed all the way through 1912. Other European countries, including Sweden in 1891, Denmark in 1892, France in 1910, and Switzerland in 1912
In a seeming paradox, the British and German systems were developed by the more conservative governments in power, specifically as a defense to counter expansion of the socialist and labor parties. They used insurance against the cost of sickness as a way of “turning benevolence to power”.
During the Progressive Era, President Theodore Roosevelt was in power and although he supported health insurance because he believed that no country could be strong whose people were sick and poor, most of the initiative for reform took place outside of government
In 1914, reformers sought to involve physicians in formulating this bill and the American Medical Association (AMA) actually supported the AALL proposal. They found prominent physicians who were not only sympathetic, but who also wanted to support and actively help in securing legislation
Meanwhile the president of the American Federation of Labor repeatedly denounced compulsory health insurance as an unnecessary paternalistic reform that would create a system of state supervision over people’s health. They apparently worried that a government-based insurance system would weaken unions by usurping their role in providing social benefits. Their central concern was maintaining union strength
Reformers felt that by covering death benefits, they could finance much of the health insurance costs from the money wasted by commercial insurance policies who had to have an army of insurance agents to market and collect on these policies. But since this would have pulled the rug out from under the multi-million dollar commercial life insurance industry, they opposed the national health insurance proposal
1917, the US entered WWI and anti-German fever rose. The government-commissioned articles denouncing “German socialist insurance” and opponents of health insurance assailed it as a “Prussian menace” inconsistent with American values
Next came the Committee on the Cost of Medical Care (CCMC). Concerns over the cost and distribution of medical care led to the formation of this self-created, privately funded group. The committee was funded by 8 philanthropic organizations including the Rockefeller, Millbank, and Rosenwald foundations. They first met in 1926 and ceased meeting in 1932
Next came Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), whose tenure (1933-1945) can be characterized by WWII, the Great Depression, and the New Deal, including the Social Security Bill. We might have thought the Great Depression would create the perfect conditions for passing compulsory health insurance in the US, but with millions out of work, unemployment insurance took priority followed by old age benefits. FDR’s Committee on Economic Security, the CES, feared that inclusion of health insurance in its bill, which was opposed by the AMA, would threaten the passage of the entire Social Security legislation. It was therefore excluded.
Rhode Island congressman Aime Forand introduced a new proposal in 1958 to cover hospital costs for the aged on social security. Predictably, the AMA undertook a massive campaign to portray a government insurance plan as a threat to the patient-doctor relationship. But by concentrating on the aged, the terms of the debate began to change for the first time. There was major grass roots support from seniors and the pressures assumed the proportions of a crusade. In the entire history of the national health insurance campaign, this was the first time that a ground swell of grass roots support forced an issue onto the national agenda. The AMA countered by introducing an “eldercare plan,” which was voluntary insurance with broader benefits and physician services. In response, the government expanded its proposed legislation to cover physician services, and what came of it were Medicare and Medicaid. The necessary political compromises and private concessions to the doctors (reimbursements of their customary, reasonable, and prevailing fees), to the hospitals (cost plus reimbursement), and to the Republicans created a 3-part plan, including the Democratic proposal for comprehensive health
One Canadian lesson — the movement toward universal health care in Canada started in 1916 (depending on when you start counting), and took until 1962 for passage of both hospital and doctor care in a single province. It took another decade for the rest of the country to catch on. That is about 50 years all together.